User talk:TallKite/Ups and Downs Notation-a

From TD Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page is very dead. You can't claim a generic system, let alone protect its page. If you're an innocent visitor, edit User:PiotrGrochowski/Ups and Downs Notation-a instead. PiotrGrochowski (talk) 17:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Protection[edit]

Why is this protected? Keenan Pepper (talk) 03:59, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Maybe because K**e is greedy and wants to claim all the xenharmony that exists! PiotrGrochowski (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
I mean, it's fine that it develops its own systems like color, but claiming this system, that is (quoted from User:PiotrGrochowski/Ups and Downs Notation-a-a) "not created by anyone, it's a mathematical miracle, just like the edos" is ridiculous. What's next? Claiming the concept of equal divisions of tritave? PiotrGrochowski (talk) 05:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
What? You wrote that!! Mike Battaglia (talk) 06:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
? PiotrGrochowski (talk) 06:30, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Kite never claimed that the system was "not created by anyone"... Mike Battaglia (talk) 06:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
It's a mathematical fact that ups and downs is a thing. Neither this fact or the notation itself need to be claimed by anyone. PiotrGrochowski (talk) 06:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Well, I went ahead and unprotected it. It seems clear to me that articles in the main namespace should be free to be edited by anyone, any we can work out conflicts (after it becomes clear there *are* conflicts) on talk pages. If you want a personal opinion article that no one else is allowed to edit, it should be a user subpage. —Keenan Pepper (talk) 16:52, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Birthday unprotection[edit]

Did you intentionally make the page unprotect at my 14th birthday (2018-11-08)? PiotrGrochowski (info, talk, contribs) 05:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC)